Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Milgrim v. Orthopedic Assoc.
as 11-4305
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Robert W. Milgrim
Defendant:
Norah H. Breen
Defendant - Appellee:
Upstate Management Associates, Incorporated and Robert M. Sedor, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pennsylvania Avenue, Binghamton, New York, P.C., as Plan Administrator of the Orthopedic Associates Defined Contribution Pension Plan, Michael McClure, Charles W. Carpenter and others
Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pe v. Sedor
as 10-2456
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pennsylvania Avenue, Binghamton, New York, P.C., As plan Administrator of the Orthopedic Assocoates Defined Contribution Pension Plan
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Robert W. Milgrim, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert M. Sedor, Jr., CFP, RFC and Upstate Management Associates, Incorporated, DBA The Bay Ridge Group
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Orthopedic Associates Defined Contribution Pension Plan, Michael McClure, M.D., Kamlesh S. Desai, M.D. and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Norah H. Breen
Milgrim v. Orthopedic Assoc.
as 10-1862
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Robert W. Milgrim
Defendant - Appellee:
Upstate Management Associates, Incorporated, Norah H. Breen and Robert M. Sedor, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pennsylvania Avenue, Binghamton, New York, P.C., as Plan Administrator of the Orthopedic Associates Defined Contribution Pension Plan, Michael McClure, Charles W. Carpenter and others
Milgrim v. Orthopedic Associates Defined
as 10-1893
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Robert W. Milgrim
Defendant:
Orthopedic Associates Defined Contribution Pension Plan, Robert M. Sedor, Jr., Upstate Management Associates, Incorporated, DBA Bay Ridge Group and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Norah H. Breen
Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pe v. Sedor
as 10-1723
Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant - Appellee:
Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pennsylvania Avenue, Binghamton, New York, P.C., As plan Administrator of the Orthopedic Assocoates Defined Contribution Pension Plan
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Robert W. Milgrim, M.D.
Consolidated-Defendant:
Orthopedic Associates Defined Contribution Pension Plan, Michael McClure, M.D., Kamlesh S. Desai, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Robert M. Sedor, Jr., CFP, RFC and Upstate Management Associates, Incorporated, DBA The Bay Ridge Group
Defendant - Appellant:
Norah H. Breen
Milgram v. Orthopedic Associates Defined Contribution Pension Plan et al
as 3:2009cv01091
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Milgram
Defendant:
Orthopedic Associates Defined Contribution Pension Plan, Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pennsylvania Avenue, Binghamton, New York, P.C., Michael McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Milgrim v. Orthopedic Assoc., et al
as 3:2002cv00255
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Milgrim
Defendant:
Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pennsylvania Avenue, Binghamton, New York, P.C. , Orthopedic Associates Defined Contribution Pension Plan , Robert M. Sedor, Jr. and others
Cross_claimant:
Robert M. Sedor, Jr. and Upstate Management Associates, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pennsylvania Avenue, Binghamton, New York, P.C. , Orthopedic Associates Defined Contribution Pension Plan , Michael McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Orthopedic Assoc. v. Sedor, et al
as 3:2000cv00238
Plaintiff:
Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pennsylvania Avenue, Binghamton, New York, P.C.
Defendant:
Norah H. Breen
Cross_claimant:
Robert M. Sedor, Jr. , Upstate Management Associates, Inc. , Norah H. Breen and others
Cross_defendant:
Norah H. Breen, Robert M. Sedor, Jr. , Upstate Management Associates, Inc. and others
Consol_defendant:
Orthopedic Associates of 65 Pennsylvania Avenue, Binghamton, New York, P.C. , Orthopedic Associates Defined Contribution Pension Plan , Michael McClure and others
Counter_claimant:
Laurence U. Schenk , Douglas R. Kerr , Kamlesh S. Desai and others
Counter_defendant:
Robert W. Milgrim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
