Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
(PC) Dailey v. Ellis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00786
Plaintiff: Sharon N. Dailey
Defendant: John B. Ellis, Jeffrey Steven Daley, Mason Minent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Lombardo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01808
Petitioner: Michael McDonald
Respondent: Sheriff Joe Lombardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mark Harris v. Michael McDonald We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56596
Petitioner - Appellant: MARK A. HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL MCDONALD, Warden
Hakim Ali-Akbar v. Michael McDonald, et al
as 14-15994
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAKIM ALI-AKBAR, AKA Fredrick Jones
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL MCDONALD, BIVINS, D. DAVEY and others
Jose Flores v. Michael McDonald
as 13-55900
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSE GARCIA FLORES
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL MCDONALD
Segura v. McDonald, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00393
Plaintiff: Jose Luis Segura
Defendant: Michael McDonald and Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali-Akbar v. McDonald et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00285
Plaintiff: Hakim Ali-Akbar
Defendant: Michael McDonald, Bivins, D Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thae Lee v. Michael McDonald
as 13-15109
Petitioner - Appellant: THAE LEE
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL MCDONALD, Warden
Akbar-Jones v. McDonald We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00058
Plaintiff: Hakim Akbar-Jones
Defendant: Michael McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Luis Sandoval v. Michael McDonald
as 12-57345
Petitioner - Appellant: LUIS MIGUEL SANDOVAL
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL MCDONALD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?