Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Salami v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2023cv12742
Plaintiff:
Michael Mohamed Salami
Defendant:
United States Department of State and National Passport Information Center
Michael Salami v. J. Niemiec, et al
as 21-1370
Defendant / Appellee:
KHRIS NEVINS, ADW, J. NIEMIEC, PREA Coordinator and JOHN BEECHER, RUM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI, named as Paralegal Michael Mohamed Salami
Michael Salami v. Chippewa Corr Facility, et al
as 19-2248
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, MDOC Sergeant - URF, UNKNOWN PARTY, Marquette Unit ARUS and JEFFREY A. CLARK, ARUS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI
Defendant:
CHIPPEWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: Michael Salami
as 19-1780
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, SONIA WARCHOK, Parole Board Member, MICHAEL EAGEN, Chairman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI
Salami v. Valade et al
as 2:2019cv11929
Defendant:
Sarah Valade, Heather Stevens, Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Mohammed Salami
Salami v. Girard et al
as 2:2019cv11918
Defendant:
S. Girard and Thomas O. Winn
Plaintiff:
Michael Mohammed Salami
Michael Salami v. Mi St Police Forensic Science, et al
as 19-1710
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN STATE POLICE POST 82, ROBERT L. STRATTON, III, Chippewa County District Attorney and MICHIGAN STATE POLICE FORENSIC SCIENCE LABRATORY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI
Michael Salami v. Thomas Winn, et al
as 19-1700
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIAM FOY, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager of Grievance Section-MDOC and THOMAS WINN, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI
Michael Salami v. Thomas Winn, et al
as 19-1634
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIAM FOY, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager of Grievance Section-MDOC and THOMAS WINN, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
