Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv06033
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv05209
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BOOB v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2008cv04804
Petitioner:
GARVIN BOOB
Respondent:
GEORGE WAGNER, THOMAS R. DECKER, MICHAEL MUKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DAZA-VALENZUELA v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv04530
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS DAZA-VALENZUELA
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, THOMAS R. DECKER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02373
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LAWRENCE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv01682
Petitioner:
PATRICK ANTHONY LAWRENCE and PATRICK ANTHONY LAWRENCE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MARY SABOL and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TRELLI v. DEPARMNT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 2:2008cv00448
Petitioner:
SUSHI MA TRELLI
Respondent:
DEPARMNT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and MICHAEL MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MAMMADOVA et al v. DECKER et al
as 2:2008cv00064
Petitioner:
ESMIRA MAMMADOVA and TENGIZ MAMMADOV
Respondent:
THOMAS R. DECKER, MICHAEL MUKASEY and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
