Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Murphy v. Global Credit & Collections Corporation
as 3:2010cv01672
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Global Credit & Collections Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murphy v. Zwicker & Associates, PC
as 3:2010cv01341
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Zwicker & Associates, PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murphy v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C.
as 3:2010cv01170
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rodgers v. San Mateo County et al
as 5:2010cv01354
Plaintiff:
Russell Dwayne Rodgers
Defendant:
San Mateo County, San Mateo County Jail Board of Supervisor, Don Horsely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 3:2009cv02942
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Murphy et al
as 4:2009cv05977
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Smith
Defendant:
Michael Murphy, Volkswagon Credit Inc. and Volkswagon Credit Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Murphy v. NCB Management Services, Inc.
as 3:2009cv02840
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
NCB Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Murphy v. Capital Management Services, LP
as 3:2009cv02648
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Capital Management Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Murphy v. Viking Collection Service, Inc.
as 3:2009cv02150
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Viking Collection Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Murphy v. ER Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01522
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
ER Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
