Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Michael Rose, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 24-8010
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROSE and TIMOTHY STRATTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and BIG TEN CONFERENCE
Lucky Lake Farm & Water Limited Partnership et al v. Clark et al
as 2:2023cv01768
Defendant:
Rodney Koch, Gordon Clark, Cindy Lou Ellen Koch and others
Plaintiff:
Lucky Lake Farm & Water Limited Partnership and Swift River Farms Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rose v. Farney, et al.
as 23-2846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ROSE, as personal representative for the of estate Bradley Rose and as personal representative on behalf of all statutory beneficiaries of Bradley Rose, deceased estate of Bradley Rose
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW FARNEY, in his individual capacity, JOSE CARDENAS, in his individual capacity, DEVIN GODFREY, in his individual capacity and others
Rose #136512 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02152
Petitioner:
Aaron Michael Rose
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Rose v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04876
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rose v. Davis
as 23-1719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ROSE
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK DAVIS and JOHN H. DAVIS, a/k/a Jack Davis
Rose v. IDEA 247 INC.
as 1:2023cv22945
Plaintiff:
Michael Rose
Defendant:
IDEA 247 INC. doing business as IDEA FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Rose v. Davis
as 1:2023cv00013
Defendant:
John Davis and Jack Davis
Plaintiff:
Michael Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Gonzalez v. FIDELITY FUNDING GROUP, LLC
as 3:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Yazmin Gonzalez
Defendant:
FIDELITY FUNDING GROUP, LLC and Michael Rose
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
D.T. v. ROSE et al
as 3:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
NICOLE GOODWIN and D.T.
Defendant:
P.O. MICHAEL ROSE, DETECTIVE P.A. ZIMMER and CITY OF EVANSVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
