Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04686
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lee et al v. Evergreen Adult Daycare Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02247
Plaintiff:
Kwon Jun Park, Jong Kook Byeon, Chung-Kil Cho and others
Defendant:
Evergreen Adult Daycare Center, Inc., Yangim Kang, Young Yoon and others
Not Classified By Court:
Michael Starr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Starr v. Michael Stars, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00860
Plaintiff:
Michael Starr
Defendant:
Michael Stars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Amaya et al v. Garden City Irrigation Inc. et al
as 1:2003cv02814
Defendant:
ABC Bonding Companies, First National Insurance Company of America, Garden City Irrigation Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leoladio Acosta, Jose Alvarado, Fredy Amaya and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
First National Insurance Company of America and Adam Tedesco
Cross Claimant:
First National Insurance Company of America, RLI Insurance Company and Universal Bonding Insurance Company
ThirdParty Defendant:
Garden City Irrigation Inc., Donna Milcetic and Adam Tedesco
Cross Defendant:
Garden City Irrigation Inc., Garden City Irrigation Inc., Garden City Maintenance, Inc. and others
212) 995-3048 (fax:
Terrance J. Nolan
Mediator:
Esq. Michael Starr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
King v. Interstate Brands Corporation
as 2:2002cv06470
Defendant:
Interstate Brands Corporation
Plaintiff:
Lisle King
Mediator:
Esq. Michael Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boyd, et al v. Interstate Brands Co
as 1:2000cv02249
Plaintiff:
William Bassett, Gene Boyd, James Boyd and others
Defendant:
Interstate Brands Corporation
212) 385-9010 (fax:
Michael Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
