Cases 21 - 30 of 34
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82833
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv55326
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS SR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv54301
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05198
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOOD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02797
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALSH et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03282
Plaintiff:
STEVEN YINGER, KAREN WILSON, NEIL WHITT and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZAGER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03160
Plaintiff:
JESSICA ANDERSEN, ZACH DANGERFIELD, KENNETH MCGAHA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RIVERS v. PIPPEN et al
as 3:2012cv00480
Plaintiff:
IZELL RIVERS
Defendant:
ALLEN PIPPEN, MICHAEL WOODS , JR, MICHAEL DANLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHALE WOOD et al v. Kirk Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 0:2011cv61135
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOOD and NORMA WOOD
Defendant:
Kirk Pharmaceuticals, LLC and VINAY SAPTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
Woods v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2009cv00028
Petitioner:
Michael Woods
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
