Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Birthmark v. Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Birthmark
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norby v. Steyh et al
as 6:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Dean Lee Norby
Defendant:
Michelle Steyh, William hitchens and Mike Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2010cv00002
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Rose
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Brian Schweitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Rose v. State of Montana, et al
as 10-35048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MONTANA, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MIKE FERRITER and others
Rose v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Rose
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana Department of Corrections, Mike Ferriter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellenburg v. Law et al
as 4:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellenburg
Defendant:
S. Law, Sturchio, Rush and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellenburg v. Law et al
as 9:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellenburg
Defendant:
S. Law, Sturchio, Rush and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cheetham v. Ferriter et al
as 6:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
Tyler Cheetham
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Mike Mahoney, Ross Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Herman v. Sharkey et al
as 6:2008cv00060
Plaintiff:
Lyle Herman
Defendant:
Sharkey, Black, C/O Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Herman v. Sharkey et al
as 2:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
Lyle Herman
Defendant:
Sharkey, Black, C/O Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
