Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Vorkapich v. Michigan State University et al
as 1:2023cv00827
Plaintiff:
Michael Vorkapich
Defendant:
Michigan State University, Alan Haller and Ashton Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Simmons v. Michigan State Houseing Development Authority et al
as 2:2023cv10448
Plaintiff:
Jelisa Simmons
Defendant:
Michigan State Houseing Development Authority, RPI Management Inc. and Joy West Manor
Stocck v. Unknown Parties et al
as 1:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
David Stocck
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Unknown Parties and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Michigan State Police et al
as 2:2019cv13082
Defendant:
County of Macomb, Michigan State Police, Judge Kathleen M. McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Duanne Tyrone Barber
Arsenault v. Devos et al
as 2:2019cv11013
Defendant:
Ascension, Michigan State University and Secretary Betsy Devos
Plaintiff:
John MIchael Arsenault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Pittman v. Pittman et al
as 2:2017cv12572
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Mark J. Cavanaugh, Nanci C. Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Keyon Pittman
Mitchell v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2015cv12445
Plaintiff:
Matrice Mitchell
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Michigan Department of Corrections, April Springer and others
Bobby Davis-Bey v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 14-1938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY D. DAVIS-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN, STATE OF, 36TH DISTRICT COURT, MSD, Judge, Courtroom 337 and others
Davis-Bey v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2014cv12317
Plaintiff:
Bobby D. Davis-Bey
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, 36th District Court, MSD and others
International-Matex Tank Termi v. Chemical Bank
as 10-1860
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL-MATEX TANK TERMINALS-ILLINOIS, a Delaware general partnership
Defendant - Appellant:
CHEMICAL BANK, a Michigan state-chartered bank
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
