Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Johnson v. Michigan Attorney General
as 2:2024cv10617
Petitioner:
Rodney Juron Johnson
Respondent:
Michigan Attorney General
Jessie v. Michigan Attorney General
as 2:2023cv11471
Petitioner:
Myron Gregory Jessie
Respondent:
Michigan Attorney General
Jones-Hill v. Bauman et al
as 2:2023cv10928
Petitioner:
Felix Jones-Hill
Respondent:
Catherine S. Bauman, Attorney General of the State of Michigan and Michigan Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick Cardello-Smith v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1657
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE CARDELLO-SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EXECUTIVE POLICY TEAM/COMMITTEE, of Michigan Department of Corrections, ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM/DIVISION, of Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cardello-Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv10520
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Executive Policy Team/Committee of MDOC, Administrative Management Team/Division of MDOC and others
Derrick Smith v. Probable Cause Conference Director, et al
as 22-1113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
PROBABLE CAUSE CONFERENCE DIRECTOR, ALL 83 MICHIGAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, ALL 83 CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES and others
Ruza v. Michigan Attorney General et al
as 2:2019cv10874
Defendant:
Michigan Attorney General, Scott Teter and M. Elizabeth Lippitt
Plaintiff:
Steven Ruza
Smith v. Michigan Attorney General
as 2:2016cv10139
Petitioner:
Stanley Smith
Respondent:
Michigan Attorney General
McCloy v. Oakland County Prosecutor Office et al
as 2:2014cv13110
Plaintiff:
David McCloy
Defendant:
Oakland County Prosecutor Office, John Skrzynski, Waterford Police Department and others
Daniel Burch v. Bill Schuette, et al
as 13-1833
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL RICHARD BURCH
Respondent - Appellee:
BILL SCHUETTE, Michigan Attorney General and BECKY CLAY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
