Cases 31 - 38 of 38
OROVILLE HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv00935
Plaintiff:
OROVILLE HOSPITAL , HARRISON MEDICAL CENTER - BREMERTON , MULTICARE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Nieves v. Middlesex Hospital
as 3:2013cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jasmin Nieves
Defendant:
Middlesex Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family & Medical Leave Act
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2012cv01502
Plaintiff:
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED , CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER , WATERBURY HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv01273
Plaintiff:
BAYLOR ALL SAINTS MEDICAL CENTER AT FORT WORTH , BAYLOR MEDICAL CENTER AT GARLAND , BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00901
Plaintiff:
MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL , BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER , NCH DOWNTOWN NAPLES HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651
WATERBURY HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00905
Plaintiff:
WATERBURY HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER , BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER , MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651
TACOMA GENERAL HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00904
Plaintiff:
TACOMA GENERAL HOSPITAL , BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER , MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651
CHIPPEWA VALLEY HOSPITAL & OAKVIEW CARE CENTER, INC. et al v. LEAVITT
as 1:2007cv02329
Plaintiff:
CHIPPEWA VALLEY HOSPITAL & OAKVIEW CARE CENTER, INC., ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM/SUNBELT, INC., FLORIDA HOSPITAL ZEPHYRHILLS, INC. and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651 Medical Care Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
