Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Nooth
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2014cv00325
Petitioner:
Cristobal Miguel Gonzalez-Aguilera
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Aguilera et al v. Peters et al
as 1:2013cv02258
Plaintiff:
C. Miguel Gonzalez-Aguilera and Christopher Lusardi
Defendant:
C. Peters and Birdie Worley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Aguilera et al v. Peters et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2013cv02258
Plaintiff:
C. Miguel Gonzalez-Aguilera and Christopher Lusardi
Defendant:
C. Peters and Birdie Worley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Nooth
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2013cv01915
Petitioner:
C. Miguel Gonzalez-Aguilera
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Nooth
as 2:2013cv01691
Petitioner:
Miguel Gonzalez-Aguilera
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Nooth
as 2:2013cv01166
Petitioner:
C. Miguel Gonzalez-Aguilera
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Miles et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2013cv00324
Defendant:
Rick Coursey, R.B. Miles and M. Youncs
Plaintiff:
Miguel Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.