Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Yellen v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Mike Yellen
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Governor Josh Green, Mitch Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Yellen v. Biden et al
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Mike Yellen
Defendant:
Joe Biden, David Ige, Mitch Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yellen v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Mike Yellen
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Governor David Ige, Officer T. Aurello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yellen et al v. Hara et al
as 1:2015cv00300
Plaintiff:
Mike Yellen, Paul Chilson and Carole Chilson
Defendant:
Glenn Hara , John S. Carroll , Merrill Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yellen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Mike Yellen
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Hawaii , Neil Abercrombie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00338
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Yellen v. United States Post Office, Hawaii
as 1:2012cv00519
Petitioner:
Mike Yellen
Respondent:
United States Post Office, Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mike Yellen v. Boyd Gaming Corporation, et al
as 11-16949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE YELLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
BOYD GAMING CORPORATION, ORLEANS CASINO, NATIONAL AMATEUR BOWLERS, INC. and others
Yellen v. Boyd Gaming Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv01976
Defendant:
Boyd Gaming Corporation, Lee Higgins, John McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Yellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-56838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
