Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Coffman v. Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit
as 6:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit, Warden Gene Miller, James M. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Milton Bates
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Timothy Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Graves v. Togo
as 6:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Scott Graves
Defendant:
Milton Togo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Nasiotis et al
as 3:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lumar Lowe
Defendant:
Theordore Nasiotis, Milton Togo, NFN Whynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Nasiotis et al
as 7:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lumar Lowe
Defendant:
Theordore Nasiotis, Milton Togo, NFN Whynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callahan III v. Nguyen et al
as 4:2022cv04176
Plaintiff:
Milton Callahan III
Defendant:
Lynn Nguyen, Christopher Dean Morton and Neal Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broome v. Temple Texas Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Richard Broome
Defendant:
Temple Texas Police Department, Temple Texas Code Enforcment Employees, Sgt M. Trunecker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarver v. Collier
as 3:2022cv01616
Petitioner:
Milton Lee Tarver
Respondent:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moreno v. Bollinger
as 2:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Victor Moreno
Defendant:
Milton Troy Bollinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinson v. City of Abilene et al
as 1:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Milton Hinson
Defendant:
City of Abilene, Craig Jordan and C Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
