Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MOAK v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05651
Plaintiff:
LASKA MOAK
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOAK v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00527
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MERCK & CO., INC. and McKESSON CORPORATION,
Plaintiff:
LASKA MOAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moak v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00357
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D. Moak
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MOAK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60851
Plaintiff:
JACK MOAK and LORINE R. MOAK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOAK v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00448
Plaintiff:
MARY MOAK
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOAK et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79186
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GRANT MOAK and MARY MOAK
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORPORATION, H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOAK v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv04185
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. MOAK
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOAK v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86951
Plaintiff:
TERRY ARNOLD MOAK
Defendant:
3M, ACandS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MOAK v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv78433
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. MOAK
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MOAK v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2008cv68594
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MOAK
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
