Cases 1 - 10 of 516
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. EDENFIELD MOBILE HOME SERVICE & REPAIR INC
as 5:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
EDENFIELD MOBILE HOME SERVICE & REPAIR INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Caplan v. Mobile Customizing, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20852
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Mobile Customizing, Inc. and THE CAR STORE USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Panchal et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Pina Panchal and South Tampa Cardiology, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sweet v. Motorola Mobility, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00009
Defendant:
Mark Sweet, Motorola Mobility, LLC, Motorola Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 0:2023mc62400
Plaintiff:
William Rose
Defendant:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG, LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
