Cases 1 - 10 of 11
First Guaranty Bank v. Mankarious et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
First Guaranty Bank
Defendant:
Victor Mankarious, Maggie Mankarious, Sameh A. Bekhit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Sahar Mohammadi, Mohammad Raeisy and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Jennifer B. Higgins, Ted H Kim and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Saeidi v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alireza Mohammadi Saeidi
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mohammadi v. AmTrust Insurance Co. et al
as 5:2018cv00896
Plaintiff:
Dana Daniela Mohammadi
Defendant:
AmTrust Insurance Co. and MKR Plumbing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00138
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mohammadi v. Nwabuisi et al
as 5:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
Dana D. Mohammadi
Defendant:
Augustine Nwabuisi, Rose Nwabuisi, Resource Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stafford v. Mohammadi
as 4:2009cv02954
Plaintiff:
Philip Stafford
Defendant:
Mohammad Mohammadi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
