Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Caldwell v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv10730
Plaintiff:
GARY CALDWELL, AFUWAPE ABOLADE, BARBARA ABRAMSON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, The Fire Department of New York and The Fire Department of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Jimenez v. Riz Bagels Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06818
Plaintiff:
Armando Hernandez Jimenez
Defendant:
Riz Bagels Inc. d/b/a Bagels Plus, Mohammed Rahman, Ibrahim Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Rahman v. Papa Johns International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05644
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Rahman
Defendant:
Papa Johns International, Inc., PJ National New York, LLC and PJ Elhurst, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Diaz v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
Alicia Noemi Bautista Diaz
Defendant:
Gate Gourmet, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Mohammed Rahman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Rahman v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03047
Defendant:
gategroup U.S. Holding, Inc. and Gate Gourmet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
mohammed rahman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Rahman v. B.R. Guest Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv09291
Defendant:
B.R. Guest Holdings, LLC , B.R. Guest, LLC , SPH Restaurant Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Rahman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jamil et al v. Finest Security Service Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02841
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Jamil, Mohammed Jamil, Mohammed Jamil and others
Defendant:
Finest Security Service Inc. and Vincent Neville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Joissin v. Habib Petroleum Corp. et al
as 9:2007cv80283
Plaintiff:
Jhonson Joissin
Defendant:
Habib Petroleum Corp. and Mohammed Rahman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
