Cases 31 - 40 of 313
Guel v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Moises Guel, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rojas et al v. Southern Underground Installations, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv60008
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Rojas, Moises Rojas and Luis Rojas
Defendant:
Southern Underground Installations, Inc., Southern Underground Industries, Inc. and Belseri Comerford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MOISE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24301
Plaintiff:
WENDELL MOISE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00172
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COMPAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19947
Plaintiff:
MOISES ANTONIO COMPAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEJARANO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19824
Plaintiff:
MOISES BEJARANO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosado, II v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv02067
Plaintiff:
Moises Rosado, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ana Rivera-Estrada, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 22-12967
Petitioner:
ANA GRISELA RIVERA-ESTRADA and MOISES AIREL MARTINEZ-RIVERA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez-Sanchez v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv01636
Petitioner:
Josue Moises Perez-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
