Cases 1 - 10 of 20
ROACH v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2023cv05011
Plaintiff:
MELVIN ANDREW ROACH, JR
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. doing business as WEPAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
BULUT v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv04276
Plaintiff:
SARAH A BULUT
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., TRACY PAI MANAGEMENT LTD., RUMELIA CAPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
FREEDMAN v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2021cv10203
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
SCOTT J. FREEDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WEICHSEL v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2020cv17849
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Stuart Weichsel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
VR CONSULTANTS, INC. v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. et al
as 2:2020cv06110
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.
Plaintiff:
VR CONSULTANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PILLER v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2020cv02248
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and TONER.COM
Plaintiff:
JUDY PILLER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
BULUT v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv09303
Plaintiff:
SARAH A BULUT
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. , VISA, INC. and VISA USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEOUGH v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE KEOUGH
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KLAUDER v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 1:2014cv03002
Plaintiff:
GERARD J. KLAUDER
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
WALKER et al v. AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv02725
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE WALKER , JUDITH CLARKE , KWASI AGYEMAN and others
Defendant:
AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
