Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Daedalus Prime LLC v. Arrow Electronics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Daedalus Prime LLC
Defendant:
Arrow Electronics, Inc., Avent, Inc., Digi-Key Electronics and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc. v. Mouser Electronics, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01431
Plaintiff:
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Mouser Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In re: Opticurrent, LLC
as 21-143
Respondent:
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. and MOUSER ELECTRONICS
Petitioner:
In re: OPTICURRENT, LLC
Opticurrent, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc.
as 21-1712
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OPTICURRENT, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MOUSER ELECTRONICS
Optical Licensing LLC v. Mouser Electronics, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Optical Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Mouser Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sensor Electronic Technology Inc v. Mouser Electronics Inc
as 3:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
Sensor Electronic Technology Inc. and Sensor Electronic Technology Inc
Defendant:
Mouser Electronics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Mouser Electronics Inc
as 2:2020cv00179
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Mouser Electronics Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
