Cases filed in California
Karluk M. Mayweathers v. B.W. Evans et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv06487
Petitioner: Karluk M. Mayweathers
Respondent: A. Laskowski, J Gastelo, B.W. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Patrick Joseph Soria et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03041
Defendant: George Wesley Pierce, Jr., Rebekah Brown, Westwood Legal and others
Plaintiff: Nationstar Mortgage LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for The Holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF10 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF10
Receiver: Robb Evans & Associates LLC, Temporary Receiver, Robb Evans and Associates LLC
Interested Party: Robert West, Morgan Picks Two LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee Formerly Known as Bankers Trust Company of California, N.A., Not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee, or its Permitted Successors and Assig and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Marina Ivanoff
Intervenor: Selene Finance, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Select Portfolio Services, LLC and others
Intervenor Defendant: All Persons Unknown Claiming any Legal or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien or Interest in The Subject Property Located at 390 South Sepulveda Boulevard Unit 208, Los Angeles, California 90049, APN, Kimberly L Yamada-Tung, Christina Gifford and others
Petitioner: Garson Silvers, DNE Associates, a CA general partnership, The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWMBS, Inc CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-HYB4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-HYB4 and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Century 21 Citrus Realty, Albert Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
KST Data, Inc. v. DXC Technology, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv07927
Defendant: DXC Technology Company,, Enterprise Services LLC, DXC Technology and others
Plaintiff: KST Data, Inc.
Counter Defendant: Armando Tan, Mitchell Evans
Interested Party: DME Products and Systems, Inc., Mr. Mitchell Evans
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Tonya Baker et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv08542
Plaintiff: Ruth Allen, Linda Avila, Mr. Avila and others
Defendant: Does, McKesson Corporation, Pfizer Inc.
Marcus L. Linthecome v. The Sheriff Leroy D. Baca et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv06555
Defendant: Chief Mr. Peitrantoni, Chief Mr. Pana, Captain Ornales and others
Not Sued: Dep. Mr. Lozano, Sgt. Mrs. Lighel, Dep, Mr. Kennedy and others
Plaintiff: Marcus L. Linthecome
Mario Louis Navarro v. Matthew Cate et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv01260
Defendant: Darral Adams, Mr. Allen, V. Allen and others
Plaintiff: Mario Navarro
Herman Rene Ontiveros v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01921
Defendant: Wiersma, Ortego, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff: Herman Rene Ontiveros
Moses Clark v. Micheal Romero et al.
as 2:2010cv03129
Defendant: Tim Evans, Mr. Reyes, Micheal Romero and others
Plaintiff: Moses Clark
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff: Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant: BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner: John Doe 1, Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other: Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified: All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc.
Intervenor: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party: Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett, Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?