Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Demaree et al v. Castro et al
as 1:2022cv08772
Plaintiff:
Matthew Demaree, Alex Yohn, Berenger Lieber and others
Defendant:
Thomas Castro, Cyril Polizzi, Quentin Detraux and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Arshad v. 2090 Gas Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv02654
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Arshad
Defendant:
Harry Singh and 2090 Gas Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Asia TV USA Ltd. et al v. Kamran International Trade Limited et al
as 1:2017cv05057
Plaintiff:
ARY Digital USA LLC, Asia TV USA Ltd., Dish Network L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Kamran International Trade Limited and Muhammad Arshad Butt
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Acar et al v. Transportation Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01713
Plaintiff:
Guray Acar, Muhammad Arshad, Melih Celik and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Acierno, John L Acierno, John L. "Chip&q Acierno, III and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cheema v. Pegasus Home Fashions, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02752
Counter Defendant:
Muhammad Arshad Cheema
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Arshad Cheema
Counter Claimant:
Pegasus Home Fashions, Inc.
Defendant:
Pegasus Home Fashions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
