Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Cody Presti v. Darren Telefoni, et al
as 22-15194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CODY JOSEPH PRESTI
Defendant / Appellee:
DARREN TELEFONI, ACO, JOHNSON, Captain, WENDEL YODA, CBA and others
Duane C. Allen v. Muriel Bowser et al
as 5:2022cv00199
Petitioner:
Duane C. Allen
Respondent:
Muriel Bowser, District of Columbia Council and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Presti v. Telefoni et al
as 1:2021cv00405
Defendant:
Case Manager Muriel Keliihoomalu, ACO Darren Telefoni, Captain Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Joseph Presti
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Lee-Zidek et al
as 1:2021cv00158
Defendant:
Sergeant Jeffrey Mane, Muriel Ah Cheong, SHU ACO's and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Pacific Gel-Ice et al
as 1:2021cv00136
Defendant:
Pacific Gel-Ice, Dr. Maura Tresch, P.A. Lisa Oyama and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Agirbaud v. Kam et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Francis X. Sequeira, Monica Lortz, Shari Kimoto and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff:
Quintin-John D'Agirbaud, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Muriel v. Raymond Madden
as 17-55668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ISMAEL MURIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN
Robert Ismael Muriel v. Kamala D. Harris
as 8:2015cv01353
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris
Plaintiff:
Robert Ismael Muriel
Justin Poole v. J. Raseknia et al
as 2:2014cv03814
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Muriel Hooker, Muriel Hooker and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Poole
Muriel Banes v. Woolf, et al
as 12-35280
Petitioner - Appellant:
MURIEL K. BANES
Respondent - Appellee:
WOOLF, Warden and FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
