Cases 21 - 30 of 152
JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE TRAINING DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
BALUKA v. BOWSER
as 1:2022cv03540
Plaintiff:
JOEL BALUKA
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ISOM v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2022cv02796
Plaintiff:
TYESHA N. ISOM
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, JOHN FALCICCHIO, SONIA SOTOMAYOR and others
IRONS v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2022cv02348
Plaintiff:
TONI IRONS
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
O'FERRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
CINDY-MAY O'FERRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CREAMER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv01874
Plaintiff:
Karen Creamer, Jane Dalen, Mary Moody and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Mayor MURIEL BOWSER, DC HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
