Cases 11 - 20 of 51
MURPHY v. USA
as 1:2022cv01382
Plaintiff:
GLENDA MURPHY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
MURPHY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00672
Petitioner:
CONCETTA MURPHY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MURPHY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00661
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MURPHY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Barlow v. US
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BARLOW, TWILA L. BARLOW, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Behrens v. US
as 22-1277
Plaintiff:
DAVID H. BEHRENS, ARLINE M. BEHRENS, JEREMY MILLS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK W. HEINTZ, HELEN M. HEINTZ, GORDON S. GEHLERT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
D&T Nail Lounge v. US
as 21-1218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D&T NAIL LOUNGE, FOOD FX INC., dba Murphy's Deli, VENEZIA NAIL SPA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Drevaleva v. US
as 21-1213
Defendant / Appellee:
PHIL JOHNSON, in his individual capacity as an Assistant Manager of 5D of the Ramond G. Murphy VAMC, CARLA DUNKELBERGER, in her individual capacity as a manager of 5D of the Raymond G. Murphy VAMC, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
McLafferty v. Wilkie
as 20-1772
Petitioner:
ROBERT MCLAFFERTY
Respondent:
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and MICHAEL J. MURPHY, in his capacity as Network Director for VISN 20 of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Murphy v. Wilkie
as 20-1085
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Not Yet Classified:
WILLIE E. MURPHY
Murphy v. Wilkie
as 19-2064
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Not Yet Classified:
DAVID G. MURPHY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
