Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stewart v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 6:2019cv02305
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Shirley Stewart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Broussard v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 6:2019cv00556
Plaintiff:
Crystal Broussard
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perry v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 6:2015cv03987
Plaintiff:
Zena Perry
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Folstrom v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 6:2015cv03741
Plaintiff:
Shawn Folstrom
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Smalls v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv01432
Plaintiff:
Donald Smalls
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Bootsma v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 6:2013cv01829
Plaintiff:
Sky Bootsma
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Watson v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 6:2011cv02461
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Watson
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Godfrey v. Associated Packing Inc Group Policy No GUC-AATR Short Term Disability Policy et al
as 3:2011cv01396
Plaintiff:
Robert Godfrey
Defendant:
Associated Packing Inc Group Policy No GUC-AATR Short Term Disability Policy and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Clayton v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 6:2007cv03043
Plaintiff:
Janet Clayton
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Putman v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 6:2007cv00630
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Putman
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
