Cases 31 - 40 of 452
Wilson v. State of Louisiana et al
as 2:2015cv05068
Plaintiff:
Lacal L Wilson
Defendant:
Louisiana State and N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henry v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv05011
Plaintiff:
Duane Henry
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Cain
as 2:2015cv05066
Plaintiff:
Marvin Robinson
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv05003
Plaintiff:
Lacal L Wilson
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gipson v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv04904
Plaintiff:
Willie Gipson
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kirk v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv04886
Plaintiff:
Keith Kirk
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stevenson v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv04776
Plaintiff:
Daimeyahn Stevenson
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv04650
Plaintiff:
Shawn Martin
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holts v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv04584
Plaintiff:
James Bernard Holts
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shank v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv04530
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Shank
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
