Cases 31 - 40 of 290
Allen v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00492
Petitioner:
Ervin Allen, Sr
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortega et al v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00747
Defendant:
Kevin Benjamin, Cody Butler, N. Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ortega and Norman Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00443
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Douglas Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv00370
Defendant:
2nd Others, N. Burl Cain, James M. LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00339
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
Kennedy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Constance v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00329
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
David Constance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grant v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00287
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, John Doe, Stephanie Lamartiniere and others
Plaintiff:
Perry M. Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv00269
Defendant:
Mary Anthony, N. Burl Cain, Jacqueline Darby and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cravanas v. Cain
as 3:2015cv00239
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Plaintiff:
Frank D. Cravanas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00223
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Nate Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
