Cases 61 - 70 of 290
Sadler v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00639
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Joshua Sadler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skipper v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00651
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Phillip Skipper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jelks v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00521
Defendant:
Trent Barton, N. Burl Cain and Cedric Ferguson
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jelks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00493
Defendant:
Kevin Benjamin, N. Burl Cain, Tim Delaney and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00390
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Anthony M Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boudreaux v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2014cv00377
Defendant:
S. Adams, D. Anthony, Kevin Benjamin and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Boudreaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Mary et al
as 3:2014cv00379
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, James LeBlanc and Anthony Mary
Plaintiff:
Jauve Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Withers v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00376
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Michael W. Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oxley v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00371
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D Buddy Caldwell
Petitioner:
Christopher Oxley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00361
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and Buddy Caldwell
Petitioner:
Anthony James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
