Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Chumaceiro et al
as 1:2020cv02220
Defendant:
Peter Khaim, LL Consulting Group, Inc., Southern Blvd Chiropractic, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Guan et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2019cv06570
Defendant:
Director of ICE Mark A Morgan, Chad F. Wolf and Matthew T. Albence
Plaintiff:
Kitra Cahana, Go Nakamura, Bing Guan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nakamura v. BRF S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv02213
Plaintiff:
Ryo Nakamura
Defendant:
BRF S.A., Pedro De Andrade Faria, Jose Antonio Do Prado Fay and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Nakamura v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv02797
Plaintiff:
Kenji Ryu Nakamura
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nakamura v. Trojan Professional Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02935
Plaintiff:
Kiyoko Nakamura
Defendant:
Trojan Professional Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Precision Associates, Inc et al v. Panalpina World Transport (Holding) LTD. et al
as 1:2008cv00042
Defendant:
Spedlogswiss, Morrison Express Corporation (USA), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Frances Wright, Gabby Gottlieb doing business as Ego Communications/Cantrade, Dan Weatherly doing business as Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sunward International Inc., David Howell Product Design Inc., d/b/a David Howell & Company, Mary Elle Fashions, d/b/a Meridian Electric and others
Intervenor:
Sony Electronics, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Dell, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Garden City Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
