Cases 31 - 40 of 82
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. A.R.B. INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUND and others
Defendant:
A.R.B. INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. CONSOLIDATED ELEVATOR CO., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01138
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM and others
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED ELEVATOR CO., INC., THOMAS G. WALLIS, II, THOMAS C. WALLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. AMERICAN EAGLE ELEVATOR, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN EAGLE ELEVATOR, LLC, WILLIAM SWEENEY and BRANDI SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension Fund et al v. Eastern Elevator Service, Inc.
as 0:2022mc60384
Plaintiff:
Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds, National Elevator Industry Pension Fund, National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan and others
Defendant:
Eastern Elevator Service, Inc. and Robert Rauch
Garnishee:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the National Eleva, et al v. Eastern Elevator Service Inc, et al
as 21-2831
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PLAN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
EASTERN ELEVATOR SERVICE INC and ROBERT RAUCH
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. CAB WORKS LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00813
Defendant:
JEFFREY OMARA and CAB WORKS LLC
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
National Elevator Industry Pen, et al v. Conagra Brands, Inc., et al
as 21-1155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF TAYLOR POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and CITY OF SARASOTA POLICE OFFICERS' PENSION PLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CONAGRA BRANDS, INC., ROBERT G. WISE, SEAN M. CONNOLLY and others
National Elevator Industry Pen, et al v. Flex Ltd., et al
as 21-15050
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL M. MCNAMARA, KEVIN KESSEL, MICHAEL C. DENNISON and others
Plaintiff:
BRISTOL COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM and DAVID KIPLING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, Lead Plaintiff
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. EASTERN ELEVATOR SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06150
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT FUND and others
Defendant:
ROBERT RAUCH and EASTERN ELEVATOR SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. JAZ ELEVATOR PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05522
Defendant:
ANITA MULLINS and JAZ ELEVATOR PRODUCTS, INC. D/B/A MTZ ELEVATOR PRODUCTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
