Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER V US
as 07-5153
Amicus Curiae:
A. Dan Tarlock, Adell Amos, Alexandra Klass and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Casitas Municipal Water District
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
STOCKTON EAST WATER V US
as 07-5142
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District and Stockton East Water District
Amicus Curiae:
Natural Resources Defense Council
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
KLAMATH IRRIGATION V US
as 07-5115
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Albert J. Robison, Baley Trotman Farms, Byrne Brothers and others
Amicus Curiae:
Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe, Klamath Tribes and Natural Resources Defense Council
Defendant-Appellee:
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and United States
COLVIN CATTLE COMPANY V US
as 06-5012
Plaintiff-Appellant:
COLVIN CATTLE CO., INC., COLVIN CATTLE CO., INC. and COLVIN CATTLE CO., INC.
Amicus Curiae:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT v. USA
as 1:2005cv00168
Plaintiff:
CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Defendant:
USA
Amicu:
STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT , PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION , ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
EMPIRE ENERGY V AIR FORCE
as 03-1277
Appellant:
EMPIRE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
Appellee:
JAMES G. ROCHE, Secretary of the Air Force
Amicus Curiae:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
KLAMATH IRRIGATION, et al v. USA
as 1:2001cv00591
Plaintiff:
KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT , TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT , ALL PLAINTIFFS and others
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS
Amicu:
OREGON, STATE OF , YUROK TRIBE , KLAMATH TRIBES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
