Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Katz et al v. Health Plan of Nevada, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
Julie Katz, Neal Katz and J. K., minor child
Defendant:
Health Plan Of Nevada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Neal v. Minev et al
as 2:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Charles Neal
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Minev, T. Manalang and S. Omandac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pineda v. Sabree et al
as 2:2022cv01426
Plaintiff:
Frankie R. Pineda, Michael A. Abenante, Amanda Abenante and others
Defendant:
Neal Hakeen Sabree, Lyft, Inc. and Nicolas Raygoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Neal v. NDOC et al.
as 3:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Neal
Defendant:
NDOC, Charles Daniels, Herald Wickham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. NDOC et al
as 3:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Neal
Defendant:
NDOC, Michael Minev, NP C Pritchett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sales v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2021cv00265
Defendant:
Erin L. Albright, Tara Carpenter, Del Porto and others
Plaintiff:
Neal Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Tep
as 2:2021cv00433
Defendant:
Tonic D. Tep
Plaintiff:
Angela Eunice Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neal Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Bullet Proof Diesel v. Sin City Diesel Performance LLC d/b/a/ Sin City Diesel & Offroad, and Dennis Tsung
as 2:2020cv02313
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies, Inc. doing business as Bullet Proof Diesel
Defendant:
Dennis Tsung and Sin City Diesel Performance LLC doing business as Sin City Diesel & Offroad
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
