Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ned v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv09135
Plaintiff:
Hope Ned
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc.,, Avlon Industries, Loreal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson Jr v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02631
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Ned Robinson, Jr
Defendant:
Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv00952
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE NED DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant:
United States , Tina Nommay, Thomas O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Zoller v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06351
Plaintiff:
Ned Zoller
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kubitz v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00480
Plaintiff:
Ned Kubitz
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ned I Price and Susan M Price
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. United States et al
as 1:2010cv00220
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant:
United States, Theresa L Springmann, Tina Nommay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Chicago Drum, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv04657
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jones, Jr., Ronald Jones, Jr., Ronald Jones, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Chicago Drum, Inc., Chicago Drum, Inc., Chicago Drum, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
