Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Intervet Inc. et al v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
as 1:2015cv00607
Plaintiff:
Intervet Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Defendant:
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0146
EI DuPont De Nemours and Company v. Boeger
as 1:2015cv00364
Plaintiff:
EI DuPont De Nemours and Company
Defendant:
Brian Boeger
Counter_claimant:
Brian Boeger
Counter_defendant:
EI DuPont De Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company v. Boeger
as 1:2015cv00359
Plaintiff:
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
Defendant:
Brian Boeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nemours Foundation v. United Healthcare of Delaware Inc.
as 1:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
Nemours Foundation
Defendant:
United Healthcare of Delaware Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
E.I du Pont de Nemours and Company v. MacDermid Printing Solutions, LLC
as 1:2015cv00280
Plaintiff:
E.I du Pont de Nemours and Company
Defendant:
MacDermid Printing Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company v. Unifrax I LLC
as 1:2014cv01250
Plaintiff:
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
Defendant:
Unifrax I LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company v. SunEdison, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01078
Plaintiff:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Defendant:
SunEdison, Inc. and NVT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In re: Bonnell, et al
as 1:2014mc00167
Respondent:
Roger Bonnell and Mari Bonnell
Movant:
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
