Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13032
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neto v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 1:2026cv10643
Plaintiff:
Tristao Neto
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10322
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv13723
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv12728
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Doyle v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv12030
Plaintiff:
Donald Moore, Carlos Cosme Cuevas, Thomas Monahan and others
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and FEDEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Acosta v. World Marble and Granite Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv11211
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
World Marble and Granite Corp. and Joao Martins Neto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Neto v. Tomasso Trattoria, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv40046
Plaintiff:
Joao Neto
Defendant:
Tomasso Trattoria, Inc. and Thomas Francis Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neto v. Tomasso Trattoria, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv40046
Plaintiff:
Joao Neto
Defendant:
Tomasso Trattoria, Inc. and Thomas Francis Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
