Cases 21 - 30 of 82
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND et al
as 2:2019cv14756
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION and THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant:
E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv14758
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND, THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv14765
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND, THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv14757
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY and THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC
Plaintiff:
THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND, THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv14767
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE 3M COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIORONMENTAL PROTECTION, THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND, THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GURBIR S. GREWAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv14734
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS, BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, NATIONAL FOAM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ATTORNEY GENERAL GURBIR S. GREWAL, PAUL R. RODRIGUEZ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY
as 2:2019cv12818
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY
as 1:2019cv12818
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. FORD MOTOR CO. et al
as 2:2019cv12157
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF RINGWOOD and FORD MOTOR CO.
Lead Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. SL INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
"ABC CORPORATIONS" 1-10, "JOHN DOES" 1 THROUGH 10 and SL INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND, THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
