Cases 1 - 10 of 16
McDonald (PS) v. Mason et al
as 1:2023cv02316
Plaintiff:
Nicholas John McDonald
Defendant:
Grant Mason, Clifton, Carillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Templeton, et al
as 23-1203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JOHN MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN TEMPLETON and JUDGE VANGILDER
McDonald v. Pilkington, et al
as 23-1130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JOHN MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE PILKINGTON and CHRIS RICHARDSON, Public Defender
McDonald v. Colorado Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-1066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JOHN MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and TIME COMPUTATION
McDonald v. No Named Defendant
as 23-1061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JOHN MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
NO NAMED DEFENDANT, Mail Handler
McDonald v. Lakewood Police Department
as 23-1065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JOHN MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER
McDonald v. Detention Center Jefferson County, et al
as 22-1452
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JOHN MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
DETENTION CENTER JEFFERSON COUNTY, MEDICAL WITHIN JEFFCO DETENTION CENTER, ARAMARK and others
McDonald v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv03208
Plaintiff:
Nicholas John McDonald
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Loss Prevention Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Lakewood Police Department
as 1:2022cv02532
Plaintiff:
Nicholas John McDonald
Defendant:
Lakewood Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Detention Center Jefferson County et al
as 1:2022cv02498
Plaintiff:
Nicholas John McDonald
Defendant:
Detention Center Jefferson County, Medical Within Facility, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
