Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rapp-Nolan v. Covidien, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11563
Plaintiff:
Claire A. Rapp-Nolan
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc., Covidien LLC doing business as Covidien, LP formerly known as Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Covidien Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nilsen v. Eastern Fish Company as owners of the F/V TRADITION
as 1:2021cv11738
Plaintiff:
Nolan Nilsen
Defendant:
Eastern Fish Company as owners of the F/V TRADITION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodman v. Nolan Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv11401
Plaintiff:
Terrell Goodman
Defendant:
Nolan Associates, LLC, d/b/a Boston Harbor Cruises, M/V Commander, LLC and Nolan Associates, LLC doing business as Boston Harbor Cruises
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
