Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Nuclear Watch New Mexico v. National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy
as 1:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
Nuclear Watch New Mexico
Defendant:
National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Savannah River Site Watch et al v. United States Department of Energy et al
as 1:2021cv01942
Plaintiff:
Savannah River Site Watch, Nuclear Watch New Mexico, Gullah/Geechee Sea Island Coalition, The and others
Defendant:
Charles Verdon, National Nuclear Security Administration, Jennifer Granholm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Nuclear Watch New Mexico v.United States Department of Energy et al
as 1:2016cv00433
Defendant:
United States Department of Energy and Los Alamos National Security LLC
Plaintiff:
Nuclear Watch New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Nuclear Watch New Mexico v. National Nuclear Security Administration of the Department of Energy
as 1:2012cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nuclear Watch New Mexico
Defendant:
National Nuclear Security Administration of the Department of Energy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Natural Res. Defense Council, et al v. Steven Chu, et al
as 09-5444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Nuclear Watch New Mexico and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Steven Chu, Secretary, Department of Energy, Stephen C. Taylor, Manager, National Nuclear Security Administration, Paul F. Prouty, Acting Administrator , U.S. General Services Administration and others
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL et al v. BODMAN et al
as 1:2008cv01709
Plaintiff:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY and others
Defendant:
SAMUEL W. BODMAN, STEVEN C. TAYLOR, JAMES A. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
