Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CONNELL v. PADGETT et al
as 4:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
LARRY GENE CONNELL
Defendant:
WAYNE PADGETT, HIGHTOWER, FORD JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHIEF OF CLASSIFICATION, DAWN CASE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Pinellas County Sheriff's Office Detention and Corrections Bureau et al
as 8:2017cv01381
Plaintiff:
Morgan Evans
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff's Office Detention and Corrections Bureau, Captain, Name Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dice v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv01298
Plaintiff:
David L Dice, Jr
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Warden Palmer, Captain Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2014cv01249
Plaintiff:
Antwan Jovon Jackson
Defendant:
John M. Palmer, State of Florida, Secretary Florida D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tierney v. Brett
as 8:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
First Name Unknown Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv03030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Martin CI et al
as 9:2013cv80171
Plaintiff:
Walter James Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin CI, The Head Warden, Name Unknown and T. Patten, N.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Martin CI et al
as 3:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
Walter James Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin CI, The Head Warden, Name Unknown and T. Patten, N.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Warden, Name Unknown
as 8:2007cv01798
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Cole
Defendant:
Warden, Name Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
