Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust v. Pessina et al
as 1:2023cv15654
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust
Defendant:
Stefano Pessina, John A Lederer, Dominic Murphy and others
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust v. Pessina, et al.
as 1:2022cv01717
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust
Defendant:
Stefano Pessina, Jose E Almeida, Janice M Babiak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kent v. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09430
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., William G. Dempsey, John P. Groetelaars and others
Dunphy v. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09371
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunphy
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., William G. Dempsey, John P. Groetelaars and others
WHITFIELD v. HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05004
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC., WILLIAM G DEMPSY, JOHN P GROETELAARS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Thompson v. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09330
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., William G. Dempsey, John P. Groetelaars and others
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan v. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09090
Plaintiff:
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., William G. Dempsey, John P. Groetelaars and others
Lieble v. Hill-Rom Holdings Inc et al
as 1:2021cv05681
Plaintiff:
Chris Lieble
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings Inc, John P Groetelaars, William G. Dempsey and others
Osborne v. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08396
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Osborne
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., John P. Groetelaars, William G. Dempsey and others
Collins v. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05699
Plaintiff:
Scott Collins
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., William G. Dempsey, John P. Groetelaars and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
