Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Percy et al v. Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation et al
as NYE/1:21-CV-02311
Defendant:
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation, Milford Management, Opengate Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Percy, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Toppin v. Incorporated Village of Hempst
as 19-2454
Defendant / Appellee:
Nassau University Medical Center, County of Nassau, Incorporated Village of Hempstead and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Earl Toppin, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of William Satchell and Antoine Satchell
Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Medical Center, Inc. et al v. Azar
as 2:2018cv01735
Plaintiff:
Legacy Waterbury Hospital, Inc., Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc., South Nassau Communities Hospital and others
Defendant:
Alex Azar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Medical Center, Inc. et al v. Azar
as 1:2018cv01735
Plaintiff:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc., South Nassau Communities Hospital, Mercy Medical Center and others
Defendant:
Secretary Alex Azar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
In Re: Huguens C. Souhaite
as 14-1516
Petitioner:
Huguens C. Souhaite
Respondent:
Nassau County Sheriff's Department, Nassau University Medical Center, Sheriff of Nassau County and others
Defendant:
DR John Doe, MD
Ireh v. Nassau University Medical Center et al
as 1:2008cv00470
Plaintiff:
Ugo Alexis Ireh, M.D.
Defendant:
Nassau University Medical Center and Nassau Health Care Corporation
Movant:
Nicole Miller
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(b) Motion to quash or modify subpoena
Ireh v. Nassau University Medical Center et al
as 1:2008mi00037
Plaintiff:
Ugo Alexis Ireh, M.D.
Defendant:
Nassau University Medical Center and Nassau Health Care Corporation
Movant:
Nicole Miller
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(b) Motion to quash or modify subpoena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
