Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Tonubbee v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2018cv00046
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, Stephanie Lamartiniere, Randy Lavespere and others
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Tonubbee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tasby v. Cain et al
as 3:2017cv00245
Defendant:
Donald Barr, Nathan Burl Cain, Carol Duthu and others
Plaintiff:
Vidale Tasby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christof v. Cain et al
as 3:2017cv00131
Respondent:
Nathan Burl Cain, Jeffery Landry and Hilar C. Moore, Jr.
Petitioner:
Hennessy Christof
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nash v. Cain
as 2:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Nash
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv03436
Plaintiff:
Louis Marshall
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, II
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv03217
Plaintiff:
Samuel J Martin
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, II and James LeBlanc
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2015cv02036
Plaintiff:
Eddie R Jackson
Defendant:
James LeBlanc and Nathan Burl Cain, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Cain et al
as 5:2015cv01999
Plaintiff:
Samuel J Martin
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, II and James LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson-Buisson v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv02361
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Watson-Buisson
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, II
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv01882
Plaintiff:
Eldrick Cook
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, II
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
