Cases 1 - 10 of 238
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Michele Vives v. City National Bank
as 2:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Michele Vives
Defendant:
City National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Watkins v. American Express National Bank
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Watkins
Defendant:
American Express National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rezac v. American Express National Bank
as 3:2023cv01849
Plaintiff:
Christine Rezac
Defendant:
American Express National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alexis Leclerc v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 2:2023cv08023
Plaintiff:
Alexis Leclerc
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fairchild v. American Express National Bank
as 3:2023cv01709
Plaintiff:
Cyndie Fairchild
Defendant:
American Express National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
