Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Alabama One Credit Union v. Barry Frederick
as 21-12348
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALABAMA ONE CREDIT UNION
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY V. FREDERICK
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alabama One Credit Union v. Toppins et al
as 7:2018cv02102
Intervenor:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul Toppins, National Credit Union Administration, Dick Holley and others
Plaintiff:
Alabama One Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Alabama One Credit Union v. Paul Toppins, et al
as 17-13363
Intervenor - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of and for the use of the National Credit Union Administration
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY V. FREDERICK and BRANDI B. FREDERICK
Interested Party - Appellee:
FREDERICK FIRM, (THE)
:
ALABAMA ONE CREDIT UNION
Corporate America Credit Union v. National Credit Union Administration
as 2:2010cv03027
Plaintiff:
Corporate America Credit Union
Defendant:
National Credit Union Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Altimas et al v. Whitney et al
as 8:2009cv01845
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Altimas, Thomas L. Altimas, Lise Girard and others
Defendant:
Russell Whitney, Michael O. Kane, Kane Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Altimas et al v. Whitney et al
as 2:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Altimas, Thomas L. Altimas, Lise Girard and others
Defendant:
Russell Whitney, Michael O. Kane, Kane Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ameda v. Nation Credit Union Administration
as 2:2009cv00468
Plaintiff:
Jacquelin Ameda
Defendant:
Nation Credit Union Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
National Credit Union Administration Board v. Liparelli
as 0:2007mc60648
Plaintiff:
National Credit Union Administration Board
Defendant:
Robert Liparelli
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
