Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Rice-Lyles v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
as 1:2018cv00876
Plaintiff:
Helen Rice-Lyles
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taribi v. Tevis et al
as 1:2018cv00806
Plaintiff:
Ebenezar Taribi
Defendant:
Joshua Paul Tevis and National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ong et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2016cv03942
Plaintiff:
Tina Ong , Han Nam Ong , Enung Njoman and others
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ifill et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2016cv03726
Plaintiff:
Sherrilyn Ifill and Ivo Knobloch
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Szabados v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2016cv03692
Plaintiff:
Linda Szabados
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1348
Moore v. Amtrak et al
as 1:2016cv03015
Plaintiff:
Bessie N. Moore
Defendant:
Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinson v. Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) Rail et al
as 8:2016cv00792
Plaintiff:
Belinda Hinson
Defendant:
Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) Rail and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Land v National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2015cv03350
Plaintiff:
Pamela Land and Gregory Land
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Land v National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 8:2015cv03350
Plaintiff:
Pamela Land and Gregory Land
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balcerzak v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 8:2015cv02862
Plaintiff:
Claire Balcerzak
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
