Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Tyner v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Tyner
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Universal Review Committe, Marting Naughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Nethanjah Breitenbach, James Dzurenda, Dr. Naughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Annikos et al
as 3:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Santos
Defendant:
Kenneth Annikos, Benson, N Britenback and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Naughton et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Dr. Naughton, Dr. Alley, Lashae Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ty Thomas v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 23-15336
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TY THOMAS
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DZURENDA and DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON
Robert LeClair v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 23-15334
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT LECLAIR
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DZURENDA, MICHAEL MINEV, DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON and others
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS and HAROLD WICKHAM
McCabe v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Dennis McCabe
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Aaron Ford, Dr M Naughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hermanson v. Naughton et al
as 3:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
James Hermanson
Defendant:
Dr. Naughton, Nurse Mitchell and Middlton
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Mulder v. Marks, et al
as 23-15090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD J. MULDER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARKS, Dr., NAUGHTON, Dr., ROMEO ARANAS and others
Thomas Brunsen v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-16987
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BRUNSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, DR. MINEV, DR. NAUGHTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
